Network Gear Situation:
With respect to frequency bands (or wireless carrier), Router are classified as:
- Single band - Will support only 2.4 Ghz band (entry level)
- Legacy Dual band - Will support both 2.4 Ghz and 5 Ghz but only one at a time
- Dual band - Simultaneously operate both the frequency bands
- Tri-band - Will support TWO 5 Ghz bands and ONE 2.4 Ghz band
Each frequency band means a virtual logical router in itself with independent SSID (Wireless network name)
A client will support either 2.4 ghz or 5 Ghz at a time. Never both simultaneously even though it cant support booth the frequency bands. And a lot of legacy Wifi clients or simple devices uses 2.4 Ghz only with only the latest ones being able to support the 5Ghz band additionally.
Tradeoffs:
- 2.4 Ghz has more range (will reach father from router/AP) but will suffer more from interference with neighbor's network.
- 2.4 Ghz has more client support (and therefore more ubiquitous)
- 5Ghz has less range and faces less interference from neighbor's network
- 5Ghz has fewer client support (only modern devices).
- 5Ghz suffers more attenuation from walls and household objects and performance falls drastically outside the room where AP/router is placed.
- 5Ghz has more channels and more bandwidth compared to 2.4 Ghz
Which will give better throughput ?
Hard to verdict with 100% confidence. It depends on what factor dominates a deployment scene. Generally if we get a good signal strength, it will be the 5 Ghz band (less interface, more bandwidth). But this changes from home to home. If signal crosses more walls, 5 Ghz range dramatically falls and makes it unusable and worse than 2.4 Ghz.
It should be clear why I hate Wifi. To many ifs and buts ...
- Suman Kumar Luthra @ APRC-P3 Telecom Sub-Committee
No comments:
Post a Comment